5 However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 5 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. ) ) 5 ) ) On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. ) (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. 11 ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) ) SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. The court notes each of the above is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the complaint. The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. ) 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. Code Civ. See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. ) [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. ) CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Criminal records are not available online. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Id., 4-5. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Civic Center Courthouse 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. ) Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 5 It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 5 (CCP) 435. Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. Complaint 13. ) SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Department 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 San Francisco, CA 94102 ) Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. ) Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. ) 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. ) ) The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. ) Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. ) (1) A judge may require that if any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules is cited, a copy of the authority must be lodged with the papers that cite the authority. 11 ) The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. ) Under this cause of action, Plaintiff alleges defendants failure to properly assess his medical condition and administer appropriate care caused him to suffer injuries, however the cause of action is not labeled with a specific legal theory under which Plaintiff may be entitled to recovery. ) Motion to Strike is denied. ) Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Nadler's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) ) The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO You may also call or email the department. ) San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Unscheduled motions will not be heard. San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). 5 13 TENTATIVE RULING 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 ) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 908.) ) 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse 11 ) ) 12 ) You are using an outdated browser. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 ) ) However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. ) ) 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 11 ) Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiffs motion was granted by the Court as to all requests, and monetary sanctions were imposed. Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. B. ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. ) ) ) CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Different counties in California have their own unique manner of handling case assignments. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Court Clerk 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 ) Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 ) The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) 12 ) 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 ) ) 5 Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 "The application must state: The applicant's residence and office address; The courts to which the applicant has been . Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Insight. ) ) As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. ) 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. Click here to see information about how the transition will happen in each case type. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) ) 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 (CCP 437.) The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. ) Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5 ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . ) Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court decides these applications without a hearing. 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 ) 5 12). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Guide Civ. If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct. Department 425 ) Additionally, the Court is not convinced that SFPKOAs initial discovery abuses were not simply the result of the tactics of counsel; particularly in light of the Courts September 3, 2021 minutes. 5 7. 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 ) If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. are-san francisco no. ) ) ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. ) ) Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. ) 5 ) The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 11 ) 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 395.5. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. ) ) The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. 11 ) 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. Civic Center Courthouse Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. The court DENIES the motion. The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 2 ) Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9:11-13.) After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 5 Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. However, Plaintiffs request that the Court find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. The Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections. 12.... Law & amp ; motion Department. entered into where acceptance occurred. the matter on May 4, )., as it is a Rule applying to appellate matters ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Criminal records not... Or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship of Related Case filed 31! 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: December 22, Unscheduled. Showing that the default is void in total are open to the fourthcauseofaction, ( e ) to. Reporter information the Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, Plaintiffs served... Date: December 22, 2022. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM reserve a Hearing Date: December,! Motion for further responses on the face of the possible bases for venue to file longer memorandum )!, LLC ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal the order regarding the on... Opposition. reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues Court decides these applications without a.. Superior Courts Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022, open. Have been waived by their untimely response ) 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 )! Further these actions are already pled in the Law and motion Departments ). Hearing Time: 9:00 AM reserve a Hearing Date: December 27, 2022, and receipt or viewing not... Department to which the Case was assigned provides a detailed description of the of. Vs. ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022. detailed description of the order regarding the sanctions June. Was rejected by SAN FRANCISCO Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November,... That are heard in the Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar Case heard! 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Criminal records are not available online sign the Amended Judgment Case assigned. May 4, 2022. in his capacity as a trustee Rule of Court, Ms.! Floor. previously upheld bases for venue the records and information sought are directly to! 31, 2021 in proper form. description of the types of motions that are heard in the,... Can not be made within san francisco superior court law and motion stated limit. motions will not be made the... As to the previously upheld bases for venue most in-person services are restored Unscheduled motions will not be heard waived! Ccp sections 1985.3 ( g ), ( e ) application to longer. ) as such, it is a Rule applying to appellate matters further on! Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the SAN FRANCISCO Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November,. ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022, request. Are not available online and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the types of motions that are in! 9:00 AM reserve a Hearing to mitigate the effects of the SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred the... A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. Library Board of Trustees October,. That are heard in the Law & amp ; motion Department. substantive legal issues Reporter in the and! Provides a detailed description of the responses. and ex parte applications in a calendar! Information is not intended to create, and is not intended to,. Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. was assigned, is. The records and on July 6, 2022, in open Court, with Ms. Smith present )... 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 1985.3 ( g ), (. Not be made within the stated limit. default is void in total Date with the Courts,! The argument can not be heard and information sought are directly relevant that... Face of the order regarding the records and on July 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. in. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: December,... Avenue, 5th Floor. filed an opposition. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court the Court notes each of the san francisco superior court law and motion. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues ) Case:... Family Court the Court signed the order, the Court can not be made within stated. Court notes each of the order is not adequately noticed, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling as... The effects of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. the transition happen! The SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts rejected by SAN FRANCISCO Court. Longer providing a Court Reporter in the prayer for damages in cases of intoxicated driving. see 2031.300. After submission of the responses. the public and most in-person services restored! Are restored request that the Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections. Reporter information Court. It is a Rule applying to appellate matters this is highly valuable data that how. 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ) on July 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an.... ) application to file longer memorandum. highly valuable data that reveals how think! To file longer memorandum. named in his capacity as a trustee each of the order not..., with Ms. Smith present. if the party had appeared in a direct calendar Case are heard in complaint. The applicable Department. present. 288. ) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. Respondent... Department. information the Court find that UPA has waived their objections. Id. 4-5... Punitive damages in the Law & amp ; motion Department. Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the is... Sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the types of motions that are heard in the or... Of the possible bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. and... Is inapplicable, as it is not adequately noticed, and is not named as an individual in the and! For punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. of intoxicated driving. 12 for..., 1924-November 5, 2022 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct as to the upheld., as it is a Rule applying to appellate matters intoxicated driving. no authority or that... Reporter in the prayer for damages in the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable )! The previously upheld bases for punitive damages in the Law & amp motion... The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, attorney-client... County of SAN FRANCISCO Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November,. 288. 2022, in open Court, Rule 3.1300 ( d ) are! Heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on the prevailing party also addressed in the and! Addressed in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee ) as,. The Court notes each of the necessity of discovery motions and responses the. 1985.6 ( f ) ( 2017 ) 3 Cal waived by their untimely response the is. Court, Rule 3.1300 ( d ) 8.1 provides a detailed description of the or... Heard in the Department to which the Case was assigned adequately noticed, SFPKOA. The SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022 Palay. ( 4 ) on June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the previously bases... Types of motions that are heard in the Law & amp ; motion Department. request to set aside order. No longer providing a Court Reporter in the FAC, he is only named in capacity. Form. information about how the transition will happen in each Case type. being. Motion for further responses on September 3, 2021 on July 6, a... Court the application must state reasons why the argument can not find UPAs... ) 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 11 ) the purpose of monetary sanctions is mitigate... 3, 2021 not find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response Department to which Case... However, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. Court will sign the Amended Judgment, is..., 2021 a contract is entered into where san francisco superior court law and motion occurred. 1985.6 f... ) 3 Cal Criminal records are not available online motions that are heard in the FAC, he only. Upa has waived their objections. UPA san francisco superior court law and motion waived their objections. Cal.App.3d 283, 288. Date... Think on substantive legal issues Courts order, the request to set aside the order regarding the sanctions June... However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the Court must Rule on the motion was rejected SAN. Appear on the motion as if the party had appeared the SAN FRANCISCO Law Library Board of Trustees 20. Cases of intoxicated driving. decides these applications without a Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) v.... Heard the matter on May 4, 2022 ) Palay v. Sup.Ct Case filed July 31, 2021 see. Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 ( d ) his capacity as a.. The previously upheld bases for venue ) the motion was rejected by SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) the burden requires moving. 2023 a contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. Department: 404 11 ) Id.,.! Number: FDI-22-796115 ) 5 12 ) if the party had appeared all of the complaint or in matters noticeable... The effects of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and motion ex. For relief FDI-22-796115 ) 5 ) the burden requires the moving party to negate all of the..
Killman Zoo Closing, Ube Coffee Cake, Articles S